Public transport post pandemic next steps
Article first publshed on ICE News site on May 16 as 'No turning back for public transport, panel debate concludes' written by Ana Bottle, assistant digital content editor at ICE |
Contents |
[edit] First Next Steps Programme convenes debate on public transport issues post-pandemic.
An ICE-led panel debate on public transport funding has concluded that there’s no returning to pre-pandemic ways of working. Part of the ICE’s new Next Steps Programme, the debate discussed how to recover the public transport networks that suffered due to Covid-19.
"Reverting to pre-Covid models is not possible but cuts would roll back years of progress,” said Jagoda Egeland, advisor to the secretary-general of the International Transport Forum and one of the panellists.
“We need to adopt more sustainable funding models linked to sustainable urban development."
The panel, which included former transport minister Stephen Hammond, said that public transport providers must understand the changes in demand and what currently drives people to use this service.
Providers must then rebalance timetables, service provision and price accordingly so that the service is affordable and reliable.
[edit] How has public transport use changed due to Covid-19?
Cities around the world experienced up to a 90% decrease in public transport use due to restrictions imposed to limit the spread of the virus.
Since these restrictions were lifted, many workers continue to work remotely, at least for part of the week.
This new trend of hybrid working has seen commuter demand concentrated on Tuesday to Thursday, with Mondays and Fridays typically experiencing lower use.
So far, operators have relied on emergency funding and subsidies from governments to adapt to changes in demand.
As priorities shift, a more sustainable funding model for public transport needs to be identified and implemented, as ICE previously stated.
[edit] The knock-on effect
The public transport funding crisis has accelerated and exacerbated challenges around service provision that existed before the pandemic.
“Public transport systems are enablers of social and environmental cohesion. It’s not a question of whether support should continue but more the structure of how that support should happen,” Jonathan Spruce, ICE trustee for policy and external affairs, said at the debate.
Without a way to sustainably fund public transport, other long-term challenges become increasingly difficult to tackle, the panellists said.
These include:
- Being fit for purpose amid changes to how people work,
- Decarbonising transport and help reach net zero,
- Boosting green economic growth,
- Addressing inadequate connectivity in rural communities, and
- Over-relying on farebox revenue.
[edit] What can be done?
Without further government funding, it’s important to come up with different strategies.
The panellists argued for a new understanding of what public transport should provide.
Rather than returning to the pre-pandemic model, new funding frameworks need to be put in place.
New policies could include:
- Congestion or road user charging,
- Workplace and/or retail parking levies,
- Land value capture, and
- Transport networks with more active travel provision and shared transport options.
[edit] Local powers and funding
The panellists also noted that long-term devolved funding and powers can be a solution to the challenge.
Local transport operators better understand what their communities need. Therefore, devolved revenue could help to directly improve these services.
By setting a clear vision of what the networks should do, locally and nationally, it will be easier to identify how to best provide, fund, deliver, operate and maintain them.
Above all, the debate concluded that the problem mustn’t be treated with short-term measures – there needs to be a strategy to fix it for the long-term.
--ICE
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.
Conservation in the age of the fourth (digital) industrial revolution.
Shaping the future of heritage
Embracing the evolution of economic thinking.
Ministers to unleash biggest building boom in half a century
50 major infrastructure projects, 5 billion for housing and 1.5 million homes.
RIBA Principal Designer Practice Note published
With key descriptions, best practice examples and FAQs, with supporting template resources.
Electrical businesses brace for project delays in 2025
BEB survey reveals over half worried about impact of delays.
Accelerating the remediation of buildings with unsafe cladding in England
The government publishes its Remediation Acceleration Plan.
Airtightness in raised access plenum floors
New testing guidance from BSRIA out now.
Picking up the hard hat on site or not
Common factors preventing workers using head protection and how to solve them.
Building trust with customers through endorsed trades
Commitment to quality demonstrated through government endorsed scheme.
New guidance for preparing structural submissions for Gateways 2 and 3
Published by the The Institution of Structural Engineers.
CIOB launches global mental health survey
To address the silent mental health crisis in construction.
Key takeaways from the BSRIA Briefing 2024
Not just waiting for Net Zero, but driving it.